Immigration Lawyers weblog

What is your stance on illegal immigration??

May 18th, 2012

Question by pretty_en_pink68: What is your stance on illegal immigration??
How do you feel about illegal immigration, and why do you feel the way you do??I understand you guys against illegal immigration feel but I don’t understand where you get the idea the immigrants are using our welfare?Have you ever applied for welfare?If you have then you’d understand how hard it is to get it. For one, you have to have a social security number AND a birth cerificate. Proof of residence, like a bill in your name, which you can’t get without a social or an ID. And proof of income. Also are you aware of the thousands of immigrants who get taxes taken out of their paychecks in hopes of filing taxes at the end of the year and never do, for fear of getting deported?I think that counts as contributing to the economy. Not to mention we work our whole lives at going to school to be something, so how many illegal immigrants do you know that are lawyers?And how many people do you know with a bachleors deggree scrubbing toilets?I think if you got your job stolen from a mexican….
you were being and idiot when you decided not to do good in school and deserved to have your job stolen by an illegal immigrant.

Immigrants come here for a better life, you had your chance at yours and looks like you f*cked up if you got your job stolen. I think you drop outs are taking your frusturation and self dissapoint out on these poor immigrants. Can someone please give a better reason than these???
Why am i a pro-crime trashy person, and people don’t hate me. Are you assuming I’m Mexican?? Well actually I am a born and raised white girl, as country as they come. I think the people who have to insult others and giving such an uneducated response…..well my point is I think we all really know who is trashy.
Illegal invasion??You think they would actually have to “illegally invade” the country if it wasn’t a 10 year wait for citizenship?? And i’m pretty sure if they could just get a visa, they wouldn’t even live here. They would work and go back and forth. I think people need to research all the facts before they answer a question they obviously do not have much knowledge about.

Best answer:

Answer by Wendy G
I completely agree with you. I hate it when people keep telling me that they steal jobs and that they don’t work as hard. I will admit that some do stuff that they shouldn’t be proud of, but not all illegal immigrants are like that. For some the only crime that they’ve committed is being here illegally. And let’s face it, the law isn’t always the right thing.

Give your answer to this question below!

Overstayed Temporary visa in canada, is it possible to apply for permanent residency with common-law partner ?

May 18th, 2012

Question by : Overstayed Temporary visa in canada, is it possible to apply for permanent residency with common-law partner ?
hello, my girlfriend is from Thailand and has been in Canada for a couple years now. For the first year she was on a temporary visa but now is without status. We have been living together for 6 months and are hoping for me to sponsor her for permanent residency under common law after we’ve lived together for 12 months. She has no children, neither do I, and I have sufficient funds to care for her for the period of 3 years that they require for sponsorship. We are both very concerned that because she overstayed her original temp. visa that she will have no chance of getting accepted for permanent residency. We have contacted an immigration lawyer to help us with the application but we would really like to know what the rules are regarding this type of situation and whether or not people have been granted PR status after overstaying on a temporary visa. Any input is greatly appreciated and if anyone knows of someone experienced in this exact case we would love to talk to them.

Sincerely,
J and B

Best answer:

Answer by skye
Call Immigration to discuss it. Your call will be anonymous and you will get real help.

Also, all the information you need is on the website at http://www.cic.gc.ca. Especially, check out the immigration manuals at http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/resources/manuals/index.asp, you can rely on them to guide you exactly. They are the directions from the government to visa officers on how to make their decisions.

Don’t rely too much on immigratin lawyers, they’ll take your money and complicate your life. You can get just as much help by calling Immigration at 1-888-242‑2100 and speak to an agent. By staying anonymous (which is your right) you can go over the details of your case and the officer will step you through what you need to do.

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Is it against tn. law to take achild to the doctor and let tenn, care pay for it .Her x had ins. on him ?

May 18th, 2012

Question by Jimmie A: Is it against tn. law to take achild to the doctor and let tenn, care pay for it .Her x had ins. on him ?
She applied for and got Tenn. care without telling him her X husband carried signa Ins. on him at the time.

Best answer:

Answer by greenjellybean
If the child isn’t covered by the husband’s signa insurance then no that’s not against the law. If the child is covered by the ex husband’s insurance then yes, that is against the law.

Give your answer to this question below!

Wanda Phillips Yoder Attorney At Law – Lynchburg, VA

May 17th, 2012

Wanda Phillips Yoder Attorney At Law 434-485-0943 www.yellowbook.com

Is it true OBAMA received foreign aid as published by AXJ? www.axjforo.com?

May 17th, 2012

Question by axjus: Is it true OBAMA received foreign aid as published by AXJ? www.axjforo.com?
Obama Faces More Questions on Citizenship

April 02, 2009

AP- WASHINGTON D.C. – In a move certain to fuel the debate over Obama’s qualifications for the presidency, the group “Americans for Freedom of Information” has released copies of President Obama’s college transcripts from Occidental College. Released today, the transcript indicates that Obama, under the name Barry Soetoro, received financial aid as a foreign student from Indonesia as an undergraduate at the school.

The transcript was released by Occidental College in compliance with a court order in a suit brought by the group in the Superior Court of California. The transcript shows that Obama (Soetoro) applied for financial aid and was awarded a fellowship for foreign students from the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship program. To qualify, for the scholarship, a student must claim foreign citizenship.

This document would seem to provide the smoking gun that many of Obama’s detractors have been seeking.

The news has created a firestorm at the White House as the release casts increasing doubt about Obama’s legitimacy and qualification to serve as president. When reached for comment in London, where he has been in meetings with British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, Obama smiled but refused comment on the issue.

Meanwhile, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs scoffed at the report stating that this was obviously another attempt by a right-wing conservative group to discredit the president and undermine the administration’s efforts to move the country in a new direction.

Britain’s Daily Mail has also carried the story in a front-page article titled, “Obama Eligibility Questioned”, leading some to speculate that the story may overshadow economic issues on Obama’s first official visit to the U.K.

In a related matter, under growing pressure from several groups, Justice Antonin Scalia announced that the Supreme Court agreed on Tuesday to hear arguments concerning Obama’s legal eligibility to serve as President in a case brought by Leo Donofrio of New Jersey.

This lawsuit claims Obama’s dual citizenship disqualified him from serving as president. Donofrio’s case is just one of 18 suits brought by citizens demanding proof of Obama’s citizenship or qualification to serve as president.

Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation has released the results of their investigation of Obama’s campaign spending. This study estimates that Obama has spent upwards of $ 950,000 in campaign funds in the past year with eleven law firms in 12 states for legal resources to block disclosure of any of his personal records. Mr. Kreep indicated that the investigation is still ongoing but that the final report will be provided to the U.S. attorney general, Eric Holder. Mr. Holder has refused to comment on the matter www.axjus.com

Best answer:

Answer by Peace & ♥♥♥♥ aka Creolegirl
not true!! don’t believe everything you read!!

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

CinciBuzz, Nations First Dedicated Twitter Advocacy, to Help Make Cincinnati USA, More Connected, Navigable, Helpful Place in Digital Space

May 17th, 2012


Cincinnati, OH (PRWEB) May 04, 2012

Members of Leadership Cincinnatis Class 35 today announced the creation of CinciBuzz (@cincibuzz), the nations first dedicated, grassroots network of advocates using social media as the digital glue to help make Greater Cincinnati USA a more connected, navigable and helpful place with real conversations in real time.

A team of informed CinciBuzz social advocates will act as digital guides, monitoring key search words on Twitter. This civic model is based on consistent conversations taking place on Twitter via search terms and hash tags such as Cincinnati, Cincy, The Nati, Northern Kentucky, Southwest Indiana and CVG. CinciBuzz social advocates will monitor tweets about Cincinnati USA and respond to posts with customer-friendly information about the region and its assets, from music to arts to food to health care.

The concept was one of several class projects submitted by Leadership Cincinnati, the competitive, annual nine-month program sponsored by the Cincinnati USA Regional Chamber that helps participants gain insight about the regions most pressing issues and encourages them to find solutions.

This is another great Leadership Cincinnati class project. Some, like Crayons to Computers and the Charitable Pharmacy at St. Vincent de Paul, are high profile, said Dan Hurley, director of Leadership Cincinnati. Others like Bridging the Gap are not so splashy, but are helping people move into meaningful work. CinciBuzz is our first venture into social media. By being digital, creative and fun, it points to the future.

CinciBuzz offers synergy with Cincinnati tourism activities and will add substance and meaning to Cincinnatis designation as Mashables Most Social City.

The launch of CinciBuzz coincides with Flying Pig Marathon weekend, where more than 30,000 visitors are expected to be in Greater Cincinnati. CinciBuzz will have a presence at the Flying Pig Expo, where patrons are expected to be issued free magnets featuring the logo and mascot, Buz iPig, or BIP.

We see CinciBuzz as another way to connect with people who are interested in Cincinnati USA and to ensure that the experiences of visitors and natives alike are positive, said Iris Simpson Bush, executive director of the Flying Pig Marathon. CinciBuzz will play a critical role in helping convey information as we welcome visitors to Cincinnati for the Flying Pig Marathon, the World Choir Games, Taste of Cincinnati, and a myriad of other activities throughout the year.

Cincinnati USA has long been celebrated for its commitment to innovation, from the legacy of inventor Powel Crosley Jr., to the current breakthroughs taking place in medicine, advanced manufacturing, aviation and knowledge-based industries across the region, said Byron McCauley, director of public relations at KnowledgeWorks and a member of the team that submitted the CinciBuzz project. CinciBuzz can continue our legacy of innovation in the digital space.

McCauley said the project was inspired by his friend, longtime Cincinnati PR executive Raymond Buz Buse, who died suddenly in March. I regret Buz did not have an opportunity to see this project take root, but we believe he would be proud of CinciBuzz.

Information Technology Entrepreneur Dave Hatter, also a member the Leadership Cincinnati team, said CinciBuzz will inspire thousands of people to interact around common interests.

At the end of the day, we enlivening a space for people to connect with one another and hopefully improve our quality of life, Hatter said. Natives may connect with newcomers because both were looking for a good foodie spot or information on CinciBuzz helped someone avoid getting stuck in traffic. That adds value to our community.

On Twitter, @CinciBuzz

Like CinciBuzz on Facebook

Join CinciBuzz on LinkedIn







Q&A: Is there a way for him to NOT be deported??

May 16th, 2012

Question by Lacey: Is there a way for him to NOT be deported??
My mom’s friend is a legal U.S. resident and 2 years ago migration called him to attend something but he didn’t. My mom told me that he “owed” something (not money). Well, yesterday migration officials went to his job and picked him up and took him to Sacramento and they’re saying that they’ll deport him back to Colombia within a week if the get to his passport or a month if they don’t so that they could get all his papers and stuff.
He’s been living here for 30 years so all his life is here. He has two daughters (18 & 20). And he’s a tax payer and everything, i mean, from what I know his “criminal” record is pretty clean.
His family doesn’t have a lawyer and he’s in jail right now.

What are his chances? What can be done? Can he come back? How?

Best answer:

Answer by Ellis Wyatt
Say “adios”. Apparently he is NOT a legal US resident.

The way to not be deported is to follow the immigration laws

What do you think? Answer below!

Do you agree with Reid wants vote on plan to let young immigrants become citizens?

May 16th, 2012
advocates for green card
by SS&SS

Question by I’m gonna start another riot: Do you agree with Reid wants vote on plan to let young immigrants become citizens?
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid announced plans Tuesday to hold a vote on a measure that would let young immigrants who came into the United States illegally become citizens – bucking a long-held Democratic strategy that immigration reforms should be dealt with as a comprehensive package.

The DREAM Act would allow young, undocumented immigrants who attend college or enroll in the military – provided they came to the U.S. before age 16 and have lived here for more than five years – to obtain green cards and ultimately, citizenship.

The legislation has been kicking around Congress for about 10 years and has received bipartisan support in the past. But previous attempts to pass the DREAM Act as an independent measure have also faced opposition, from both Republicans –- who as a party do not support the legislation –- and Democrats who argue that addressing the legislation on its own saps energy from passing a more comprehensive immigration bill.

Reid seemed to address those concerns as he made his announcement Tuesday, explaining that it would be impossible to take up comprehensive immigration reform this year.

“I tried so very, very hard, but those Republicans we had in the last legislature have left us,” he said.

Reid said he would attach the DREAM Act as an amendment to a defense spending bill that the Senate is expected to take up next week. The bill already is being used as a vehicle for another controversial piece of legislation – the repeal of the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy, which the Obama administration has advocated repealing, but Republicans oppose.

Reid said he had not coordinated his plans to include the DREAM Act in that package with the White House, but wouldn’t speculate about whether he has the votes to get it passed.

http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/sep/14/harry-reid-wants-vote-plan-let-illegal-immigrants-/

Best answer:

Answer by Evelyn j
yes i agree 110%. the DREAM act should be passed ASAP!

Give your answer to this question below!

Chances for having Green Card revoked?

May 16th, 2012

Question by Nuttyprincess: Chances for having Green Card revoked?
Hi,
My husband had got his GC 2 and half years ago, last year he had done shop lift, we went to the court and paid the fine for petty theft and now we are also seeing a lawyer to see that the case can be nullified, but now i am applying my GC with my Husband’s current I-485, will this affect my case? will he be deported? What are the chances for his GC being revoked? please answer seriously as we are very tensed.

Best answer:

Answer by ahmosis3
If you leave the US for 6 months or more, you won’t be able to get back in.
You will have to go home and start all over again with the process! As for comiting crime while visiting….
Goodbye Y’all!

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Latest Law Firms For Citizenship News

May 15th, 2012

Freedom to Worship
law firms for citizenship

Image by elycefeliz
Freedom of religion is a principle that supports the freedom of an individual or community, in public or private, to manifest religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship, and observance; the concept is generally recognized also to include the freedom to change religion or not to follow any religion.

The freedom to leave or discontinue membership in a religion or religious group —in religious terms called "apostasy" —is also a fundamental part of religious freedom, covered by Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Freedom of religion is considered by many people and nations to be a fundamental human right.

In a country with a state religion, freedom of religion is generally considered to mean that the government permits religious practices of other sects besides the state religion, and does not persecute believers in other faiths.

Historically freedom of religion has been used to refer to the tolerance of different theological systems of belief, while freedom of worship has been defined as freedom of individual action.

Each of these have existed to varying degrees. While many countries have accepted some form of religious freedom, this has also often been limited in practice through punitive taxation, repressive social legislation, and political disenfranchisement.

Most of the early American colonies were generally not tolerant of dissident forms of worship, with Maryland being the only exception. For example, Roger Williams found it necessary to found a new colony in Rhode Island to escape persecution in the theocratically dominated colony of Massachusetts.

The Puritans of the Massachusetts Bay Colony were the most active of the New England persecutors of Quakers, and the persecuting spirit was shared by the Plymouth Colony and the colonies along the Connecticut river. In 1660, one of the most notable victims of the religious intolerance was English Quaker Mary Dyer who was hanged in Boston, Massachusetts for repeatedly defying a Puritan law banning Quakers from the colony. As one of the four executed Quakers known as the Boston martyrs, the hanging of Dyer on the Boston gallows marked the beginning of the end of the Puritan theocracy and New England independence from English rule, and in 1661 King Charles II explicitly forbade Massachusetts from executing anyone for professing Quakerism.

Another example of religious persecution by Puritans in Massachusetts was the Salem witch trials in 1692 and 1693. Thirty-one witchcraft trials were held, convicting twenty-nine people of the capital felony of witchcraft. Nineteen of the accused, fourteen women and five men, were hanged. One man who refused to enter a plea was crushed to death under heavy stones in an attempt to force him to do so.

Adam Smith, in his book The Wealth of Nations, (using an argument first put forward by his friend and contemporary David Hume) states that in the long run it is in the best interests of society as a whole and the civil magistrate (government) in particular to allow people to freely choose their own religion as it helps prevent civil unrest and reduces intolerance. So long as there are enough different religions and/or religious sects operating freely in a society then they are all compelled to moderate their more controversial and violent teachings, so as to be more appealing to more people and so have an easier time attracting new converts. It is this free competition amongst religious sects for converts that ensures stability and tranquillity in the long run.

Smith also points out that laws that prevent religious freedom and seek to preserve the power and believe in a particular religion will, in the long run, only serve to weaken and corrupt that religion. As its leaders and preachers become complacent, disconnected and unpractised in their ability to seek and win over new converts.

The Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion & Public Life performed a study on religious freedom in the world, for which data were gathered from 16 governmental and non-governmental organisations – including the United Nations, the U.S. State Department and Human Rights Watch – and representing over 99.5 percent of the world’s population. According to the results, that were published in December 2009, about one-third of the countries in the world have high or very high restrictions on religion, and nearly 70 percent of the world’s population lives in countries with heavy restrictions on freedom of religion. This concerns restrictions on religion originating from both national authorities and social hostilities undertaken by private individuals, organisations and social groups. Government restrictions included constitutional limitations or other prohibitions on free speech.

Roger Williams (c. 1603 – between January and March 1683) was an English Protestant theologian who was an early proponent of religious freedom and the separation of church and state.

In 1636, he began the colony of Providence Plantation, which provided a refuge for religious minorities. Williams started the first Baptist church in America, the First Baptist Church of Providence.

He was a student of Native American languages and an advocate for fair dealings with Native Americans.

When Roger and Mary Williams arrived in Boston on February 5, 1631, he was welcomed and almost immediately invited to become the Teacher (assistant minister) in the Boston church to officiate while Rev. John Wilson returned to England to fetch his wife.

He shocked them by declining the position, saying that he found that it was "an unseparated church." In addition he asserted that the civil magistrates may not punish any sort of "breach of the first table [of the Ten Commandments]," such as idolatry, Sabbath-breaking, false worship, and blasphemy, and that every individual should be free to follow his own convictions in religious matters. Right from the beginning, he sounded three principles which were central to his subsequent career: Separatism, freedom of religion, and separation of church and state.

As a Separatist he had concluded that the Church of England was irredeemably corrupt and that one must completely separate from it to establish a new church for the true and pure worship of God. His search for the true church eventually carried him out of Congregationalism, the Baptists, and any visible church. From 1639 forward, he waited for Christ to send a new apostle to reestablish the church, and he saw himself as a "witness" to Christianity until that time came. He believed that soul liberty freedom of conscience, was a gift from God, and that everyone had the natural right to freedom of religion. Religious freedom demanded that church and state be separated. Williams was the first to use the phrase "wall of separation" to describe the relationship of the church and state. He called for a high wall of separation between the "Garden of Christ" and the "Wilderness of the World." This idea might have been one of the foundations of the religion clauses in the U.S. Constitution, (although the language used by the founders is quite different) and First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Years later, in 1802 Thomas Jefferson, writing of the "wall of separation" echoed Roger Williams in a letter to the Danbury Baptist Association.

In October 1635 he was tried by the General Court and convicted of sedition and heresy. The Court declared that he was spreading "diverse, new, and dangerous opinions." He was ordered to be banished. (This order was not repealed until 1936 when Bill 488 was passed by the Massachusetts House.) The execution of the order was delayed because Williams was ill and winter was approaching, and he was allowed to stay temporarily provided he ceased his agitation. He did not cease, so in January 1636 the sheriff came to pick him up only to discover that Williams had slipped away three days before. He walked through the deep snow of a hard winter the 105 miles from Salem to the head of Narragansett Bay. There he was rescued by his friends, the Wampanoags, and taken to the winter camp of their chief sachem, Massasoit.

The outcasts rowed over to Narragansett territory, and having secured land from Canonicus and Miantonomi, chief sachems of the Narragansetts, Williams established a settlement with twelve "loving friends." He called it "Providence" because he felt that God’s Providence had brought him there. (He would later name his third child, the first born in his new settlement, "Providence" as well.) He said that his settlement was to be a haven for those "distressed of conscience," and it soon attracted quite a collection of dissenters and otherwise-minded individuals.

From the beginning, the settlement was governed by a majority vote of the heads of households, but "only in civil things," and newcomers could be admitted to full citizenship by a majority vote. In August 1637 they drew up a town agreement, which again restricted the government to "civil things." In 1640, another agreement was signed by thirty-nine "freemen," (men who had full citizenship and voting rights) which declared their determination "still to hold forth liberty of conscience." Thus, Williams had founded the first place in modern history where citizenship and religion were separated, a place where there was religious liberty and separation of church and state.

In 1643, the neighboring colonies formed a military alliance called the United Colonies and pointedly excluded the towns around Narragansett Bay. The object was to extend their power over the heretic settlements and put an end to the infection. In response Williams was sent to England by his fellow citizens to secure a charter for the colony. The English Civil War was in full swing in England when Williams arrived. The Puritans were then in power in London, and through the offices of Sir Henry Vane a charter was obtained despite strenuous opposition from agents from Massachusetts. Historians agree that the key that unlocked the door for Williams was his first published book, A Key Into the Language of America (1643). Printed by John Milton’s publisher the book was an instant "best-seller," and gave Williams a large and favorable reputation. This little book was the first dictionary of any Indian tongue in the English language and fed the great hunger of the English about the Native Americans. Having secured his precious charter for "Providence Plantations" from Parliament, in July 1644 Williams then published his most famous book, The Bloody Tenent of Persecution for Cause of Conscience. This produced a great uproar, and Parliament responded in August by ordering the book to be burned by the public hangman. By then, Williams was already on his way home to Providence Plantations. Also, by then, the settlers on Aquidneck Island had renamed their island "Rhode Island."

Williams intended to become a missionary to the Native Americans and set out to learn their language. He studied their language, customs, religion, family life and other aspects of their world. As a result he came to see their point of view about colonization and developed a deep appreciation of them as people. He wrote his A Key into the Language of America (1643) as a kind of phrase book coupled with observations about life and culture as an aid in communication with the Indians. In it he talked about everything from salutations in the first chapter to death and burial in chapter 32. The book also sought to instruct the English, who thought of themselves as vastly superior to the Native Americans, that they were mistaken. He repeatedly made the point that the Indians were just as good as the English, even superior in some respects.
"Boast not proud English, of thy birth & blood;
Thy brother Indian is by birth as Good.
Of one blood God made Him, and Thee and All,
As wise, as fair, as strong, as personal."

Having learned their language and customs, Williams gave up the idea of being a missionary and never baptized a single Indian. He was severely criticized by the Puritans for failing to Christianize them, but Williams had arrived at the place in his own thinking that no valid church existed. He said he could have baptized the whole country, but it would have been hypocritical and false. He formed firm friendships and developed deep trust among the Native Americans, especially the Narragansetts. He was able to keep the peace between the Indians and English in Rhode Island for nearly forty years because of his constant mediation and negotiation. He twice surrendered himself as a hostage to the Indians to guarantee the safe return of a great sachem from a summons to a court: Pessicus in 1645 and Metacomet (King Philip) in 1671. He more than any other Englishman was trusted by the Native Americans and proved to be trustworthy. In the end King Philip’s War (1675–1676) was one of the bitterest events in his life as his efforts ended with the burning of Providence in March 1676, including his own house.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers